A universal patient identifier system would give one number to each individual, seamlessly connecting him or her to his or her medical records. The article covers two sides to the issue.
Proponents of UPIs argue they are the most efficient way to limit the current data overload, lower unnecessary costs and improve patient care. Opponents argue UPIs bring risks around patient privacy and data breaches and the possibility of selling patient codes for commercial benefit.
Sign up for our FREE Spine E-Weekly for more coverage like this sent to your inbox!
Related Articles on Electronic Health Records:
"Doctors Helping Doctors" Encourages Physicians' Health IT Adoption
57% of Office-Based Physicians Used EMRs, EHRs in 2011
Survey Finds 25% of Healthcare Providers Use Tablets in Their Practice
a
Are Unique Patient Identifiers the Future of Medical Records?
Written by Kathleen Roney | January 25, 2012
While the U.S. works to convert the medical record system from paper to electronic, a transition to universal patient identifiers sparks debate over trust, privacy and control, according to a The Wall Street Journal report.
Tagged under
© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2011. Interested in LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View our policies here.